Resistance to Change: A Baby Boomer’s Perspective on Computers and the Internet

A lot of people resist transition and therefore never allow themselves to enjoy who they are. Embrace the change, no matter what it is; once you do, you can learn about the new world you’re in and take advantage of it.” ~Nikki Giovanni 

“Why can’t things go back to the way they use to be?” That rhetorical question was asked by my friend, Jay, a fellow boomer who frequently expresses dislike for most things technical including computers and cell phones. His disdain for such gadgets is not only the result of occasional encounters with computerized devices that refuse to yield to his touch; it is ongoing warfare with any gadget that requires more steps to operate than turning it on and off.  And although he occasionally uses the Internet, he feels that he could easily live without it, without email, without cell phones and texting. I could go on, but that might imply that he is a dinosaur, which would be an insult to every prehistoric creature ever recreated in a computer simulation.

Humans are creatures of habit. We get used to doing the same old things, the same old way. Change will never be embraced by everyone, nor will resistance to change prevent it. Like it or not — change happens; so the sensible thing to do would be to accept and enjoy it.

I recently went to the post office to mail a small package. Sometimes when I go there, I purchase a roll of stamps that usually lasts for several months, because I use them infrequently to snail mail a birthday card or send something to one of the few organizations that still doesn’t offer online services. On this particular day, when the clerk asked me if I needed stamps, I said that I didn’t need any and she replied with a wide grin, “You know y’all have to mail those bills, don’t you?” I returned her smile and responded innocently, “No, I pay my bills on line.” 

Freeze!  Apparently, I said the wrong thing on the wrong day, because

Continue Reading
6 Comments

Throwback the Throwbacks

As is the case with nearly everything, people have their preferences. On this occasion, I am sharing the opinion of armchair quarterbacks; concerning NFL throwback uniforms.

Before I reveal what some may find to be the surprising viewpoints of the AQ’s, let me report that according to Wikipedia “Throwback uniforms have proven popular … not only with fans, but with the teams’ merchandising departments.”  That statement begs the question:  who in the name of gridiron is buying those awful looking jerseys?

Who likes them? There is mixed opinion among the football fans surveyed for this post. One fan said, “They [the teams] should just stay with the regular uniforms and find another way to commemorate special occasions.”  If they want an alternate look, why not get something more contemporary? Most of the throwbacks look outdated and unstylish. Oh, but isn’t that what they are?

Actually, the throwbacks of some teams are not that bad looking. According to some survey participants, the award for the least favorite and ugliest retro uniform goes to the Pittsburg Steelers. When that team brought out their throwbacks last week in the game against the Washington Redskins, it looked to me like someone had released a box full of Tony the Tigers on the field. A commenter on another blog saw it differently. He wrote, “Not sure if I’m looking at a football player or McDonald’s next hamburglar [sic].”  And still another fan wrote that he was confident that the Steelers’ uniforms were intended to distract the Redskins. Apparently, the ploy worked.

Someone else, expressing disappointment with the wearing of throwbacks by any team wrote, “There’s a reason those uniforms are no longer in use.” And a very candid football enthusiast may have scored a theoretical touchdown with fans that are in consensus when he voiced this opinion, “Whoever suggested wearing throwback Jerseys? When we find out we should check to see if that person’s last address was a psychiatric ward.”

Earning honorable mention in the category of all-time ugliest throwback uniforms — whenever they are worn — are The Packers, The Bears, and the Broncos.

For some old timers, throwback uniforms may bring back memories as it did to one blogger who wrote on Yesterday’s Heroes, “Looking at a classic throwback jersey is like looking at a 1957 Chevy, you never get tired of looking at something so beautiful.”  Regardless of sporadic praise for throwbacks, the majority of the people I questioned turned thumbs down on the retros and unanimously agreed that when it comes to throwback uniforms — what was worn in the past should stay in the past.

0 Comments

What Women Want: Tickets

Women learn at an early age that some things require patience – like waiting for Santa Claus, reaching our 18st birthday, and getting tickets for a live television talk show.

There are a few tricks that might get a wannabe audience member into the studio:  stand-by and use chutzpah like the now ex-Salahis; implement a write-in campaign with the determination of a president running for a second term; or sign-up on the show’s website and wait — with the patience of Job. There is another way to get tickets; not just for a live TV show, but for just about anything. It is the ultimate trump card:  have connections. It works for me!

My affinity for quality talk shows began in the early days of Phil Donohue, but my favorite contemporary program is The View. I will tell you about the arrival of my long-awaited opportunity to be an audience member on The View, but first let me share some of my past live studio experiences.

In the early 1980s, I was twice an audience member at The Carol Randolph Show, which was broadcast locally on CBS. Then, on one spring morning, as my son, daughter, and I were enjoying our favorite week-end activity – roller skating in Rock Creek Park – we were filmed by the crew of the weekly TV program Saturday Magazine. The show was producing a feature about single parent families, and my children and I were part of the live studio audience when the segment aired on WTOP in March 1983.

Audience members at live talk shows get the opportunity to see their favorite hosts and celebrity guests in person, as I did at The Carol Randolph Show. Lou Rawls was the singing guest on one show that I attended. Millie Jackson was the other. I visited briefly with both in their dressing rooms. But enough of my horn-tooting, you want to know how to get your own studio tickets, don’t you?  Here is the deal.

If you don’t have a friend who works with the show to hook you up,

Continue Reading
0 Comments

Busting Loose – Shh! For Women Only

Is your bra killing you? The husband and wife research team, Sydney Ross Singer and Soma Grismaijer, reveal in their book, Dressed to Kill, that women who wear tight-fitting bras are more likely to have breast cancer than women who do not wear bras at all. Their theory is that tight bras inhibit the proper functioning of the lymph system. On the contrary, the National Cancer Institute does not list bras among breast cancer risk factors. The issue is still open to debate. 

Having shared that food for thought, I’m switching from a serious issue to a lighter side of — the bra. 

According to NOBRA (the North American Boobs Rescue Association) women are not wed to their bras. In fact, if we were, many of us would divorce them. From Germaine Greer, bestselling author of The Female Eunuch who wrote that “Bras are a ludicrous invention,” to Whoppi Goldberg who, a few months ago, admitted on The View that she has not worn a bra in 45 years, women are busting loose and letting it all hang out. By the way, you say you never heard of NOBRA?  Neither has anyone else. I made that up. But if it were a real organization, I believe it would be on the Forbes List of top 100 companies.

Continue Reading
2 Comments

Revisiting Olympic Moments — Present and Past

Peter Norman, Tommie Smith and John Carlos. Photo by Photobucket.

She/he was pretty in pink — stuntman, Gary Connery that is. When he parachuted from a helicopter into London’s Olympic stadium last Friday evening, disguised as 86 year old Queen Elizabeth II, Connery created quite an impressive opening for the 2012 Olympics.

Unless you’ve been living under a molehill during the past few days, then you know it’s that time again. It happens quadrennially. Millions of people worldwide eagerly watch and talk about the Olympic games. Not me. I’m no sports enthusiast and I’m not watching.  Occasionally, I’ll root for my home team during football season or, if the Williams sisters are playing in the tennis matches I’ll tune-in, but that’s the limit of my tolerance for sports. As far as I am concerned, a full week of 24/7 sporting events is overkill.   

I made it a point, however,  to watch this year’s Olympics opening, because after hearing about the excitement surrounding the opening in Beijing, four years ago, and later seeing some spectacular highlights on the news, I felt like I really missed an unprecedented event.  

Some events are impressive, but — in the larger scheme of things — they’re insignificant; others are unforgettable.

Rewind to the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City.

Black athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos won gold and bronze metals. When The Star Spangled Banner played, the two bowed their heads and raised their arm in a black gloved, clinched fist, Black Power salute. That action catapulted them into controversial history.

Smith and Carlos considered their gesture a show of support for human rights, but their deed stunned the stadium crowd and drew boos. And while the courageous duo were scorned by many in the U.S., they also garnered the praise of countless supporters, including the silver medalist, Australian Peter Norman, who supported Smith and Carlos while in Mexico, in their heroric strike against civil injustices.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) President Avery Brundage was neither empathetic, nor forgiving. He considered the salute by the two Black athletes to be an inappropriate, political statement. Smith and Carlos were stripped of their medals, suspended from the U.S. team, and banned from the Olympic Village.

Back in America Smith and Carlos and their families faced death threats, lost jobs, and suffered various retaliatory actions that sent their life into a downward spiral that included the suicide of Carlos’ wife.

Time may heal all wounds, but it sometimes leaves deep scars. And, 0ccasionally, it brings restitution.

 In 2005, San Jose State University honored former students Smith and Carlos with a 22-foot high statue of their protest.

Peter Nelson, who had been a strong supporter of Smith and Carlos died in 2006 and his Black “brothers” served as his pall bearers. 

On July 30, 2012, a documentary, SALUTE, produced by Peter’s son, Matt, was released in honor of Smith, Carlos, and Norton. I enjoyed the 92 minute film and found it to be a touching, timely, and a well deserved tribute. It is available on DVD, some cable stations, and Amazon Instant Video.

 

0 Comments